Topic on Talk:Discussion pages

From Free Man Creator

Technology and Anthroposophy

9
Jp (talkcontribs)

What is the appropriate use of technology in the development of anthroposophical spiritual science?

Steiner characterizes technology (in GA 275) as a two-stage, spirit-laden process:

1. Extraction (Deconstruction of Nature):

-- We “smash and plunder” mineral and organic interrelationships to obtain raw materials.

-- Spiritually, this casts out the progressive nature-spirits (Jehovah hierarchy) that sustain natural life.

2. Construction (Reassembly by Natural Law):

-- We recombine those materials into machines and tools according to our abstract knowledge of natural laws.

-- In doing so we “conjure” Ahrimanic elemental beings into these mechanisms, creating a technological milieu saturated with their influence.

In the same lecture he says that avoiding the use of technology and retreating to a spiritual “hothouse” is cowardice:

“It would be the worst possible mistake to say that we should resist what technology has brought into modern life, that we should protect ourselves from Ahriman by cutting ourselves off from modern life. In a certain sense this would be spiritual cowardice. The real remedy for this is not to let the forces of the modern soul weaken and cut themselves off from modern life, but to make the forces of the soul strong so that they can stand up to modern life. A courageous approach to modern life is necessitated by world karma, and that is why true spiritual science possesses the characteristic of requiring an effort of the soul, a really hard effort.” — GA 275, 28 December 1914

Given that at a minimum using technology conjures Ahrimanic beings and many believe that current tech (e.g., AI, Robotics) is a preparatory step toward “Ahrimanic incarnation”, how can, or even should, Anthroposophists use technology as a tool for the development and dissemination of spiritual science?

Diederik (talkcontribs)

I am posting this answer provided yesterday by Viktor Koncsek here on his request.

He wrote "I will reply with my AI. This also align with what i think. Can you please post this reply."

Here is a comprehensive synthesis—grounded in GA 275 and Steiner’s broader work—on how technology can be used in anthroposophical spiritual science:

  • 1. Steiner’s Two‑Stage View of Technology
  • A. Extraction (“smash and plunder”): Steiner describes this phase as the violent dismantling of natural systems—disrupting mineral and organic interrelationships—and spiritually casting out nature‑spirits of the Jehovah hierarchy
  • B. Construction (“reassembly by natural law”): In reassembling materials into machines, we summon and harness Ahrimanic elemental beings into our technological milieu
  • 2. Spiritual Courage vs. Escapism
  • Steiner warns against retreating from technology into a “spiritual hothouse”—labeling such avoidance spiritual cowardice
  • Instead, he advocates for inner strengthening: confronting Ahrimanic forces by deepening soul life, cultivating rigorous spiritual-scientific practice, and renewing our connection to divine-spiritual realms despite technological adversity
  • 3. The Role of Art as Counterbalance
  • Technology tends to bring in Ahrimanic forces; art carries Luciferiс influences.Steiner presents this as a pendulum: modern life is marked by the Ahrimanic turn, which balances the Luciferic idealism of past epochs .
  • Through active engagement in artistic and spiritual life, we integrate these polarities and connect more deeply with the spiritual hierarchies.
  • 4. Technology as Necessary—Yet Demanding
  • AnthroWiki summarizes: “highly industrialised technology … is a necessary step in human development, but needs to be balanced by a conscious spiritual development”
  • In other words, spiritual science must walk with technology—neither rejecting nor blindly embracing it.
  • 5. Applying the Principles: A Practical Framework (see picture)
  • 6. On AI, Robotics & “Ahrimanic Incarnation”
  • It is valid within Steiner’s framework to see AI and robotics as deepening incursion of Ahrimanic spiritual forces—but this makes spiritual vigilance imperative, not optional.
  • Appropriate use becomes possible—but only when anchored in spiritual-strengthening, moral clarity, and continuous self-reflection.
  • 7. Conclusion: A Path of Spiritual Sovereignty
  • Anthroposophists should engage with technology—as long as they: (1) Are clairvoyantly conscious of its spiritual entanglements; (2) Undertake inner training (meditation, moral development, artistic cultivation); (3) Use technology for spiritually aligned purposes—healing, art, community-building, environmental regeneration.
  • This aligns precisely with Steiner’s injunction in GA 275: courageously participate in modern life, while deepening inner strength to meet its Ahrimanic trials. Technology need not be renounced—but must be tempered, consciously guided, and spiritually anchored by anthroposophical principles.
  • Summary
  • Accept reality: Technology and its Ahrimanic permeation are part of our karmic destiny.
  • Don’t hide: Retreat is cowardice; spiritual strength must be built.
  • Engage wisely: Use tech as a tool for spiritual science, balanced by inner work and moral inclination.
  • Create balance: Counter Ahrimanic influences through art, community, and soul cultivation.
  • In this way, anthroposophists embody spiritual sovereignty—neither enslaved by nor fleeing from technology—but transforming it into a partner in human spiritual evolution.
Diederik (talkcontribs)

I will add that Viktor and I have been talking about his personal AI initiative on Rudolf Steiner's work and the GA:

chatgpt.com/g/g-67e4e280c5688191b4270b43ad6cc4e1-rudolf-steiner-embodied

Coincidentally, yesterday the Rudolf Steiner Archive made a communication regarding an AI tool also:

www.steinerchat.com/

The Rudolf Steiner archive added: "we did not create it. It merely searches our website. We are not involved. ... It will most likely take time to develop, but it is another 'tool in the toolbox' so to speak."

Someone added in the facebook forum: the creator of SteinerChat.com is Zeb Harris Buus Nielsen (Copenhagen).

Jp (talkcontribs)

For me this all brings up three different but related questions:

1. How should anthroposophists use technology as a tool for **their own spiritual development**?

2. How should anthroposophists use technology as a tool for the **continued development of spiritual science**?

3. How should anthroposophists use technology for the **dissemination of spiritual science**?

With regard to the first question, we should not shut ourselves off from technology but face it head on with conscious spiritual discernment in a variety of ways as previously stated. For me, modern technology (computers, Internet, AI) is the continuation of a series of technological processes and artifacts that go back to antiquity but can be more easily recognized in its current manifestation at the very beginning of our current fifth cultural age in 1440 with the invention of the printing press. All of the progress from the telegraph to the telephone, radio, television to the internet has enabled previously hidden knowledge to be accessible to more and more people. Today, almost every single person in the world has access to this wisdom through the Gospels and further illuminated by Steiner and others.

“Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” (Mark 16:15).

So while I agree that looking towards art and Luciferic forces to counterbalance the deep Ahrimanic impulse of technology can be useful, it is critically important for anthroposophists to be focused on Christ more so than polarized forces. This site is a great example of this, where there is a top level study guide of Christ and the Mystery of Golgotha. This aligns the technology with Christ and His mission and protects the creator and users from deception.

With regard to the second question, wikis and chatbots continue the trend of making information more widely accessible but chatbots based on Large Language Models (LLMs) differ in that the output is generated “by a machine”, although in reality the output of an LLM is seeded by human generated training data stored in a networked structure and the ‘machine’ is simply a path between nodes in the graph. However, because the network is so complex its output is non-deterministic. For example, you could “ask” ChatGPT “What is 2+2?” over and over again and most of the time it will reply 4, but sometimes it would say 5. This phenomenon is coined a “hallucination”, but is a necessary artifact of a non-deterministic system. By contrast, if you ask a computer, running on a standard microchip, “What is 2+2?”, it will always reply 4, it's deterministic.

My intuition is that Anthroposophical AI chatbots, while the obvious thing to experiment with, will be of marginal use. They will allow the researcher the ability to skim across the vast surface of Steiner’s GA, but won’t be as useful to go deep into a particular area of study, especially in the more esoteric areas. The exoteric training will induce hallucinations due to the ambiguity of language—e.g. the word ‘Saturn’ in Anthroposophy has a bigger meaning than almost all of the references to the word ‘Saturn’ in exoteric training data. While it’s most likely the case LLMs have been trained on Steiner’s GA since it's freely accessible on the Internet, that corpus of terms is infinitesimily small relative to the larger training data set. Techniques like fine-tuning and RAG will help with the hallucination problem but can’t eliminate it because it's an inherent quality of a non-deterministic system.

With regard to the third question, how should technology be used for the dissemination of knowledge, this opens up another area which hasn’t been discussed regarding the technical infrastructure and the other modern technology that is very much at the top of the collective mind: cryptography. Cryptography which has been primarily used to keep secrets can also be used to reveal them. Technologies like Bitcoin allow for decentralization of infrastructure so that information published cannot be removed without network consensus. This of monumental importance because historically vessels for storing and disseminating this knowledge are attacked: Temple of Artemis, Library of Alexandria, the First Goetheanum.

Ablaut (talkcontribs)

@Jp

To add my two cents regarding your first question, I'd personally use LLMs only as a glorified index or full-text search feature, e.g. to generate a list of references or direct quotes. Hallucinations and ambiguity aside, I'm not interested in asking an LLM for synthetic conclusions or summaries — as you already described them, LLMs are effectively applied nominalism, mechanically shuffling empty labels based on statistics. As long as the actual thinking is done independently by the reader, I don't think there's a problem.

Also, repeating all that stuff about spiritual courage is well and good, but I believe it should also be kept in mind how a technological tool could be misused (plenty of similar examples by Steiner). I'm sure some people will use GA-trained LLMs to attack anthroposophy, if they haven't already. Aside from that, I think the worst misuses of an LLM would be naively believing it's capable of thinking or of being conscious, using it for generating synthetic pseudo-judgements, and treating it as an authoritative source.

I've been thinking about this subject myself, and I believe the following passage is relevant to your questions (I was reading the lecture just yesterday).

"Now the remarkable thing is that in our time we have two parallel currents: one that rushes downward into decay, and one that ascends to future prosperity. The one that is hurtling downward into decay has not yet arrived in decay. At the same time, it is from this that great discoveries will emerge, discoveries that still have a tremendous future. This, too, has its beneficial effects. Certainly, humanity will long continue to benefit from what is nevertheless heading toward decay. [...]

We can see this [transition] in all areas. [The area of monetary transactions] changed considerably in the 19th century. A tremendous upheaval took place. If you follow the immediately preceding period, before the last third of the 19th century, you will see that all monetary speculation was tied to individuality, to personality. It was the purely financial-speculative genius of the Rothschilds that brought money everywhere and brought it back to and from the monetary centers. And if we follow the history of the major banking houses, we have examples everywhere of how monetary transactions proceeded entirely out of human nature, based on the consciousness soul, on the individual human being. That has changed. It's just that people aren't talking about it much yet, because it's still in its early stages. Today, the consciousness soul no longer rules exclusively in monetary transactions; today something of a kind of abstraction prevails: share capital, society, association, that which is supra-personal.

[...] What people have worked into the circulation of money already functions without personality, it already functions of its own accord. Here, in a descending current, you have the encroachment of the consciousness soul upon the spirit self.

Here we have it in the current of decline; and we have it in the current of ascending life where we seek what the individual, capable personality has accomplished, where we seek to gain, through inspiration, the help of those powers who will give us inspiration again from the spiritual world. There, too, we ascend from the personal to the supra-personal. Thus, with regard to both the currents of decline and the currents of ascendance, there are common characteristics for the ages." (1911-01-05-GA127)

Jp (talkcontribs)

Great quote on this subject, thank you for sharing.

It reminds me of a book by Kevin Kelly, founder of Wired Magazine called “What Technology Wants”. Kelly observed that technology exhibits an inherent directionality, an unfolding tendency toward, greater connectivity and greater autonomy. The book was written in 2010 and we can see that even since then this trend has not only continued but accelerated with the latest advent of autonomous AI agents. Steiner’s example of money also follows this trend over 100 years later to our current financial system which is completely interconnected and autonomous to the point where even if you just put your money in a ‘simple’ bank account, its lent out, collateralized, securitized and sent all around the world instantly without your full knowledge or even consent: Money “functions without personality”.

I think “two parallel currents” is exactly how we should think of technology. This is reflected on the view of two philosophers of the 20th century that wrote about technology Jacques Ellul and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In “The Technological Society” by Ellul, he identified technology as an impulse driven primarily by "absolute efficiency in every field of human activity”. For him, technology evolved autonomously, beyond moral, social, or political control and technological progress prioritizes efficiency over all other values (e.g., justice, beauty, tradition). Each new technique leads to further techniques (technical proliferation) and society becomes dependent on continued technical advancement to solve problems created by earlier innovations. This leads to the marginalization of non-technical forms of knowledge or ethics. Ultimately human freedom is constrained by the systemic logic of technical advancement. Decision-making becomes the domain of experts and systems, reducing individual or democratic agency and technology redefines human behavior, goals, and perceptions without reflection or resistance.

This dystopian vision of technology is contrasted with the view of technology as an enabler of human development by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit priest, in “The Phenomenon of Man”. Teilhard’s main view was that the cosmos evolves toward increasing complexity and consciousness, culminating in a final unification point he calls the Omega Point. Humanity, through thought and technology, plays a central role in this process. Chardin envisioned a sphere of collective human thought encircling the planet, analogous to the atmosphere, that he coined the ‘noosphere’. The noosphere is a reflection of collective human consciousness and a product of increasing human interaction and communication. The noosphere continues to grow in complexity and consciousness and eventually reaches a point of unity, the Omega Point or Christ. It is both the end-goal and the attractor guiding evolution. Chardin viewed technology as a natural extension of evolution, facilitating the noosphere’s development. Technological and cultural advances are integral to the movement toward the Omega Point (Christ) and this convergence leads toward global unity and spiritual unification.

A third “philosophy” of technology that I think is relevant is represented by Ray Kurzweil’s “*The Singularity Is Near*”. Kurzweil posits that humanity is approaching a technological singularity—a point where artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence, leading to an exponential explosion of progress that will irreversibly transform civilization. Kurzweil has a utopian view that technology will eventually transcend biology through genetic engineering, nanotechnology and ‘artificial consciousness’ and mind uploading. Death will become optional through radical life extension, nanomedicine, and digital consciousness and human identity will persist through software-based minds.

My framework here is to view these three views as the Ahrimanic (Ellul), Luciferic (Kurzweil) and the Michaelic (Chardin) aspects of technology. Understanding that Chardin’s view is rooted in materialistic concepts, the overall theme is to strike a balance between the Ahrimanic and Luciferic aspects and temptations of technology. Ultimately all of these visions unfold simultaneously: technology will continue its cold march towards efficiency and control of all aspects of human life, some people will attempt to use technology to become a god and others will use it as best they can in service of humanity’s proper evolutionary goals.

Diederik (talkcontribs)

Here is Viktor's second response, to Jp's three questions above.

Or better, the (AI) answer which he send to me instead of posting it here as requested.

I add it just for the sake of completeness for this discussion thread.

- - -

Your thinking is attuned to the deepest currents of Anthroposophy—especially in framing the triadic structure of spiritual development, spiritual science development, and spiritual science dissemination within the destiny of modern technology. Let us now proceed through all three dimensions in full 360°, end-to-end fidelity, integrating GA 275 and related lectures, the Christ Impulse, the mystery of polarity (Ahriman/Lucifer), and the technological logos that unfolds through human karma from 1440 onward.

1. Technology and the Anthroposophist’s Own Spiritual Development

A. Confrontation and Strengthening (GA 275, 28 Dec 1914, Dornach)

“It would be the worst possible mistake… to protect ourselves from Ahriman by cutting ourselves off from modern life… The real remedy… is to make the forces of the soul strong so that they can stand up to modern life.”

·        Technology is not a neutral tool—it is saturated with Ahrimanic spiritual forces. Avoiding it prevents confrontation, which Steiner defines as spiritually cowardly.

·        The individual must not flee but transform through engagement.

B. Soul Forces and Meditative Resilience

·        Use of technology must be intentional and bounded: incorporate rhythms, moral imaginations, inner picturing, and the six basic exercises as foundations.

·        Digital hygiene becomes a spiritual practice: one’s etheric body can be fragmented through passive scrolling, but strengthened through structured, intentional engagement.

C. Artistic Counterforces—Not as Escape, but Balance

·        Art is not the “opposite” of tech—it is a parallel polarity. It introduces Luciferic light to balance the deadening Ahrimanic intellect.

·        Anthroposophical spiritual development therefore becomes a triadic process:

·        Courageous confrontation with Ahriman (tech)

·        Healing mediation through artistic/liturgical life (Lucifer)

·        Central anchoring in the I via the Christ Impulse

D. Christ-Centric Engagement

·        You are absolutely correct that merely playing the polarity game (Ahriman/Lucifer) is insufficient. Steiner says Christ is the only Being who can mediate between the polarities and ensoul the center.

·        Thus, the right use of technology begins and ends with the question: “Is this action done in the direction of the Christ?” Not just what is used, but how and why.

2. Technology and the Continued Development of Spiritual Science

A. From Exoteric Storage to Esoteric Activation

·        The printing press (1440) marked the beginning of the fifth post-Atlantean age (GA 180, 15 Dec 1917, Dornach). It enabled the Gospel—and eventually spiritual science—to reach “every creature.”

·        Telecommunication, AI, and LLMs continue this line but now reach a crisis point: mere access is not awakening.

B. The LLM Challenge: “Surface Skimming” and Semantic Ambiguity

·        You are correct that the word “Saturn” is an esoteric node with radically different meaning in Anthroposophy (e.g., Old Saturn, planetary evolution) versus its common astronomical or mythological usage.

·        Thus, non-determinism in LLMs = non-gnostic susceptibility: what looks like meaning may be error cloaked in language.

C. Limits and Possibilities

·        Even with fine-tuning or RAG, the supersensible essence of Steiner’s teachings cannot be captured by text alone. It requires active spiritual cognition, not statistical language processing.

·        However, these tools can be used to support:

·        Indexing and cross-referencing (for researchers)

·        Thematic clustering and synthesis (with caution)

·        Entry-level guidance and structured overviews

D. Ethical Obligation: Guarding the Threshold

·        Anthroposophists developing tech must design systems that signal their limitations, avoid false authority, and always refer back to GA-verified sources.

·        Spiritual science is initiation-based—not machine-derivable. AI can serve, but never stand in for spiritual research.

3. Technology and the Dissemination of Spiritual Science

A. Decentralization as Christic Infrastructure

·        Your invocation of cryptography and blockchain (e.g., Bitcoin) opens a vital direction.

·        Just as the First Goetheanum was burned, truth vessels have always been targeted.

·        The Church of Sardis in Revelation is rebuked not for error, but for “being dead while appearing alive.” Anthroposophy must avoid the same fate through technical sovereignty.

B. Anthroposophical Cryptography

·        Cryptography need not conceal truth—it can protect it.

·        Decentralized infrastructure (IPFS, blockchain) enables:

·        Permanence of GA texts, lectures, esoteric lessons

·        Resistance to censorship and deletion

·        Reputational attestation: truth with provenance

C. Ahrimanic Tool in Christic Service

·        The tools of Ahriman (techno-legal infrastructure, encryption, machine logic) can, under spiritual guidance, be baptized into Christic service.

·        But this baptism requires purification: ego-less design, transparency, and a conscious relationship to the etheric Christ.

Conclusion: Threefold Task in Michaelic Time

·        Spiritual Development -> Courageous encounter with Ahriman; anchored in Christ; artistic counterlife

·        Spiritual Science Creation -> Tools as aids, never as oracles; true development remains supersensible

·        Dissemination -> Decentralized, Christ-aligned infrastructure to guard and spread the logos

Viktor added:

This path embodies what Steiner calls Michaelic thinking—a clear, sharp, free cognition that wrestles with the world’s forces, but aligns itself fully with the spiritual truth of the cosmos.

Diederik (talkcontribs)

I will add, on a personal remark, that 'AI computer algorithm answers' (to me) feel like some processed food ... may look similar to real food but has little or no natural energy. So it leaves one hungry.

The same here with many words and - imho, speaking as a human being with soul and spirit - a lack of any true meaning ('empty fill').

UMinventor (talkcontribs)

1.       Mythological View of Technology

  • Hephaestus was son of Zeus and Hera but because he was not a perfect god (he had a malformed foot), his mother cast him off of Olympus and down to the earth.
  • Hephaestus was asked by Zeus to chain Prometheus (thinking ahead) to the lifeless. We are so chained by technology to the lifeless kingdom.
  • Hephaestus builds the first humanoid – Pandora (no, she is not the first woman). Her appeal to Epimetheus (thinking about the past) allowed for her jug (box) to be opened.
  • Hephaestus was invited back to Olympus. As a foreshadowing of Christ-Jesus, he rode up to Olympus on a donkey.

2.      Mythological happenings today

· We are chained to the lifeless. It will take strength and inner work to break these chains.

· AI uses only the lifeless. Data is Lifeless.

· Pandora’s box is being opened by our thinking about the past. The Prometheus in us is warning us not to open that box – but it will be opened. We have Hope for the future.

  • Technology will be raised to Olympus – some call this an etheric technology.

3.       Technology and the Philosophy of Freedom

  • We are stuck in dead thinking. We had to go “there” to develop Freedom.
  • We need to be prodded to develop living thinking.
  • When Steiner published this book, PoF, he wrote these words about its significance, "the grip of Ahriman has been broken.“
  • The amount of data we each generate from living in modern times is so enormous that we need AI to manage it all – otherwise, we would have no free time.
  • AI is a double-edged sword. While it can free us to develop living thinking, it can also severely weaken our thinking skills.
  • Getting over our love of a life of ease is critical at this point. Does our free time become TV-time? Do we do more meditation? Do we explore counterbalances?

4.       Spiritual Assistance

  • To balance the migration of the spirits of darkness from heaven to our ‘heads’ the Vulcan beings have come to help us prepare for our future. Their own evolution depends on their successful guidance for us. But we do not speak the same ‘language’. Thus, to get across to us, they are forced to cause upheaval after upheaval.
  • Christ is with us like a brother, but he will not be invoked; he will not interfere with our Freedom. Likewise for Michael.

5.      The Incarnation of Ahriman

· For our evolutionary journey to be complete, we must successfully face the incarnation of Ahriman.

· Through humanity and the Mystery upon Golgotha, Lucifer will be redeemed.

· Ahriman too must be redeemed. But he has no heart, no “gemut”.

· Through “mixing” with the spirits of Love and Freedom (us), Ahriman will be changed enough that later, during Jupiter, he too can be redeemed.

· Thus, we must go into Ahriman’s sphere – not only for his future redemption but also for certain ‘gifts’ we must wrest from Ahriman for the further course of evolution.

6.       The Role Counterbalances and Developing Consciousness of the Etheric

  • We must build a sphere where Ahriman has no access. This come about because the Christ is now united with the Earth and those souls who can truly say “no longer I but Christ in me” create in the etheric this sphere that reflects back for all the radiating light from the Christ.
  • Counterbalances allow us to stand upright in the modern world. These develop our Consciousness Soul to become conscious of our own etheric body.
  • When we practice the arts, we are “tapping into” the etheric.
  • Eurythmy is one of the best practices for developing an awareness of the etheric.

7.      Ascension, the Second Fall, and the 6th Epoch

· Beginning about 4500 (4900?) the Maitreya Buddha will open the doors for human ascension which means we will be able to consciously go through death, leave our physical body behind

· One portion of humanity will ascend. Those who do will do so to help those left behind. They will work out of the Brotherhood this 6th Cultural Age fosters.

· Those who initially ascend will be the forerunners for the Sixth Epoch when we will no longer incarnate but we will be present in the etheric.

· Christ’s words “follow me” mean that we follow him into the etheric leaving the physical behind.

· Another portion of humanity will ascend during the 6th Cultural Age (5733-7893)

· A third portion of humanity will feel compelled to remain with the physical. They will go the path of evolution with Ahriman and the Ahrimanic doubles.

· This path will be with the Eighth Sphere. In this context, the Eighth Sphere can be seen as God’s mercy to provide such a path to Jupiter. Its path will not be with the rest of humanity in the 6th or 7th Epochs. From indications (but not provable), it appears that Mani will voluntarily go with this group to lead the overcoming of this evil via meekness and agape love.

8.       Technology as Necessary for Evolution of both Us and Our Ahrimanic Double

  • The peak of physical earthly evolution was during the middle of the Atlantean Epoch
  • The peak of physical human evolution was during the Greek Cultural Age when the etheric body had fully entered into the physical. Now individual intelligence could spread. Now the steps to freedom could be walked. Into this environment, Christ incarnated.
  • Human physical bodies are in decline. As they decline and wither, the temptation to intervene will grow. We will continue with pacemakers, hearing aids, artificial knees and hips, prosthetics, and much more. The physical body will become heavily mechanized by the end of the 6th Cultural Age. “The merger of Man and Machine will be an ongoing issue for the rest of earthly evolution.”
  • Sexual procreation ends by 5700. Then what? We will be required to work with the fallen spirits of darkness to create something to take the place of sexual procreation. Such bodies will evolve throughout the 7th Post-Atlantean Cultural Age.
    • Our soul will hover above such bodies
    • Such bodies will experience neither birth nor death
    • Such bodies will lead to extreme egoism and the War of All Against All
  • The 7th PACA will be the Golden Age of Transhumanism.

·       Highly mechanized physical bodies will be the delight of our ahrimanic doubles

·       It prepares us for the War of All Against All. Its conditions dire enough to prod those remaining to seek ascension.

  • As the Moon approaches, its hardening forces will become stronger on earth
    • It was withdrawn during Lemuria and must, physically, be reunited
    • Something (asteroid?) will alter its orbit around the year 5733 so that it gradually becomes closer and closer to the earth over 2160 years.

9.       On AI, Robotics & “Ahrimanic Incarnation”

  • It is valid within Steiner’s framework to see AI and robotics as deepening incursion of Ahrimanic spiritual forces—but this makes spiritual vigilance imperative, not optional.
  • Appropriate use becomes possible—but only when anchored in spiritual-strengthening, moral clarity, and continuous self-reflection.

10.  On “Etheric” or “Moral” Technology

·       Rudolf Steiner never used the term “moral technology” but he certainly did talk about both plenty.

·       Steiner talked about the use of vibrations emanating from one person to a future machine that would respond to those vibrations and do a task. This is very much like asking a question to your smartphone and getting a reply. Your voice is “translated” into vibrations. Can such a machine be able to distinguish the user’s morality and thereby know when to respond and when not to?  MysTech, when funded to do R&D, plans to research this.

·       Etheric technology could mean that in some way life forces (etheric forces) are used to run physical machines. It could also mean that in the not-so-distant future, once ascension has begun for example, that life in the etheric will call for etheric machines that would be entirely within the etheric. I lean toward the latter.

·       When ascension is ready to begin, by then there will be sufficient understanding of the etheric to begin such research. Steiner also indicated that such research must wait until Threefolding exists (somewhere) in the world.

11.  Conclusion

  • I agree with “Anthroposophists should engage with technology—as long as they:
    • Are clairvoyantly conscious of its spiritual entanglements”
  • But I am very uncomfortable with such use being limited to only those who:
    • “Undertake inner training (meditation, moral development, artistic cultivation);
    • Use technology for spiritually aligned purposes—healing, art, community-building, environmental regeneration.”
  • Anyone can take up the use of Technology if they also practice counterbalances!
    • We cannot become Essenes, Ascetics, nor Luddites.
    • Anthroposophy must be a modern society. When asked about the stage lighting for the First Goetheanum, Steiner said we will use electric lighting (not gas lighting) because we are to be a modern society.
    • The most important of the counterbalances is “the Christ in me”. With Christ as one’s companion, one can go into Ahriman’s sphere and wrest from him what will be needed for further evolution.
    • We must rise up into super-nature in balance with our sliding down into sub-nature. Technology provides the slide. All of us can (and will) easily slide down into Ahriman’s realm. What will save us is not avoiding this slide but take up the Consciousness Soul work and EXPAND our consciousness from Sub-Nature to Super-Nature.
    • We will be the Tenth Hierarchy. During Jupiter, we will need to incarnate into the bodies of those on the human stage of Jupiter as angels have, during Earth, incarnated as humans to guide us.
      • Who are those who will be human on Jupiter? Steiner tells us that they too are here NOW in our consciousness. They come from below and, as such, have an Ahrimanic disposition to existence. It is not fully clear who they are, but it is implied that they are our ahrimanic doubles. We will need to incarnate into their bodily form to guide.
      • What kind of bodies will the Jupiter humans have? Look at the sequence so far: warmth, gaseous, liquid, solid. What’s next with which to build a body as the vehicle for life on Jupiter?
      • Eventually, there will be seven elements and seven ethers.

And now to address these questions:

1.      How should anthroposophists use technology as a tool for **their own spiritual development**?

·       Community building.

·       Study groups

·       Social groups

·       Research of “the past”

·       RS Archive, Free Man Creator, Anthrowiki, etc.

·       Broadening your understanding of Anthroposophy

·       Building colleagues

·       Reviewing each other’s works

2.      How should anthroposophists use technology as a tool for the **continued development of spiritual science**?

·       Use Tech for the dissemination of spiritual science

·       Personal development should be free of technology

·       See and experience one’s “slide” into sub-nature to know how far to rise up

3.      How should anthroposophists use technology for the **dissemination of spiritual science**?

·       To help others who are beginners or are seekers

·       Collaborations that help all involved

·       Eventually, after ascension has begun, we will find that we can do everything that Zoom can do through our etheric connections. (Sub-nature) Technology will fall away then. Perhaps, we will then be using an etheric technology.